Carbonite

Bottom line: Excellent and comprehensive online backup with easy remote file access, exclusive discount
MyPCBackup

Bottom line: Unique combination of unlimited backup, file syncing across computers, cloud storage and external drive backup
Mozy

Bottom line: Great low-cost online backup with exclusive discount; can back up external drives
SugarSync

Bottom line: Best combination of online backup, cloud storage and multi-device sync; free 30-day trial
LiveDrive Backup

Bottom line: Simple and cheap backup that lets you use unlimited storage space for one computer; nice service for backing things up on the go
SpiderOak

Bottom line: Most secure, customizable, streamlined file backup for advanced users
SOS Online Backup

Bottom line: Packed with new features, includes 5 computers and local backup; nice interface, savvy mobile apps, and social media backup
IDrive

Bottom line: Solid backup with a lot of configurability; no mobile app access or file sharing
ElephantDrive

Bottom line: Solid online backup with file sharing and the ability to back up to 3 computers, though the interface is not the best
Norton Online Backup

Bottom line: Fast and transparent browser-based backup with file sharing; infrequent backup schedule
IBackup

Bottom line: Geared towards businesses; Exchange and SQL backups; compliance for financial, medical companies
Dropbox

Bottom line: Well-priced solution for file sharing and collaborative work; not true automated backup solution

Enter your email address to receive NextAdvisor.com Daily Blog updates:

Categories


Blog Archives


Concerns raised about Amazon's Cloud Drive and privacy

March 31st, 2011 - Posted by Kent

An article over at ZDNET is raising privacy concerns about Amazon's new music-streaming Cloud Drive service. Writer Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols notes that Amazon's terms of use give the service carte blanche to access user files. Amazon.com's TOS (Terms of Service) states that:

5.2 Our Right to Access Your Files. You give us the right to access, retain, use and disclose your account information and Your Files: to provide you with technical support and address technical issues; to investigate compliance with the terms of this Agreement, enforce the terms of this Agreement and protect the Service and its users from fraud or security threats; or as we determine is necessary to provide the Service or comply with applicable law.

This might not seem like a big deal, but pay attention to the part where they say they can access your files to "investigate compliance with the terms of this agreement." Compliance, in section 5.1, means:

that you have all the necessary rights in Your Files that permit you to use the Service without infringing the rights of any copyright owners, violating any applicable laws or violating the terms of any license or agreement to which you are bound."

Vaughan-Nichols worries this could lead Amazon to sweep user accounts looking for material that violates copyright, and then hand over those user accounts to the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) for enforcement. Is this really different from other online backup service providers like SugarSync? SugarSync's TOS simply states that:

We respect the privacy and confidentiality of your Files, so we agree never to disclose your Files to anyone unless you instruct us to do so or a court orders us to disclose them, as provided in our Privacy Policy.

SugarSync's TOS also contains provisions against abuse of the system, which includes anything that might "violate or infringe the rights of third parties, or expose SugarSync to any actual or potential civil or criminal liability." That could theoretically include material that violates copyright. They also don't want nudity. But will they go into your files to find it?

Content screening is a big, ugly can of worms for any Internet service provider to get into. There are liability issues, true, but it's also difficult to do; there's simply too much data to make combing through every file worthwhile. Amazon, however, has a much cozier relationship with the RIAA and the labels it represents. YouTube is already using its Content ID system to let entertainment companies find unauthorized uses of their material on the video sharing site. Amazon could employ a similar mechanism to allow entertainment companies to identify infringing files.

I don't think Amazon's terms of service are too terribly different from anyone else's. They must comply with the law, specifically the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, but also with subpoenas from law enforcement related to more serious crimes. Any Internet service provider would have to do the same. There's another reason that Internet service providers don't get into pro-active content screening: It makes them liable for everything stored on their servers. As it is, they're only responsible for what they know about. If and how Amazon might allow entertainment companies to look for infringing content through a system like Content ID is unknown.

But let's take a step back. In the end, much of it comes down to user responsibility. Everyone should know by now that copyright violation is illegal. Amazon's Cloud Drive is primarily meant as storage for MP3s legally purchased or ripped from CDs owned by the account holder. Stick to that, and you'll be fine. Cloud Drive is not a great online backup service for other files because it's not automatic. Those worried about Amazon sniffing through their personal files would be better off going through a service like Carbonite, Mozy or IDrive which handles automatic backup and lets you manage your own personal encryption key. That way no one but you can read your files—just don't lose your encryption key.

2 Responses to “Concerns raised about Amazon's Cloud Drive and privacy”

  1. Fresno DUI Attorney Says:

    Wish the cloud would auto categorize your music into folders

  2. Jame Boyington Says:

    This may not be the best place to ask this, but, I'm looking for a attorney in Fresno and I can't figure out where to look do you know anything about this a good Fresno attorney? They're located in Fresno, 20 min from me I can't find reviews on them — Fresno Attorneys, 1713 Tulare Street #215, Fresno, CA 93721 – (559) 460-0529

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments



Disclosure: NextAdvisor.com is a consumer information site that offers free, independent reviews and ratings of online services. We receive advertising revenue from most of the services we review. Our editors thoroughly research and whenever possible test each service we review and offer their honest opinions about each one. We are independently owned and operated and all opinions expressed on this site are our own.