Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2012

Bottom line: The best at protecting you and your computer. Updates include a vastly improved performance and several features to make things easier on the user.
Kaspersky Internet Security 2012

Bottom line: A vast improvement in its interface, installation and performance make Kaspersky a best bet for those who are looking for easy, fast, top-notch security.
Avast! Internet Security

Bottom line: Fast, affordable and easy to use. Best for users who want a simple, user-friendly interface. Discount for NextAdvisor users.
BitDefender

Bottom line: For those who want top-rated protection without the interruptions. New features help improve performance and give users a few more options for security.
Eset Smart Security 5

Bottom line: If you aren't in to all the bells and whistles and just want the simplest security software that will protect your computer, ESET is your best bet.
McAfee Total Protection 2012

Bottom line: Standard PC security with a few new features that could turn heads; exclusive $20 discount
Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete 2012

Bottom line: Good product for those just looking for the basic protection. Easy install, simple interface and quick performance.
ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite 2012

Bottom line: Full-featured, low-fuss improvement to previous ZoneAlarm software; good value, but hard to measure effectiveness
Trend Micro Internet Security 2012

Bottom line: Best bet for users looking for quality, inexpensive software. New features up the software's game.
Iolo's System Shield 4

Bottom line: Inexpensive, reliable software with a cool detection feature. Confusing interface and difficult installation downgrades its score. Discount for NextAdvisor readers.
AVG Internet Security

Bottom line: Good security software if you are looking for all the bells and whistles at half the price.
PC Tools

Bottom line: PC Tools Internet Security has a nice user interface and is easy to use, but it under-delivers on consistency and performance
CA Internet Security Suite Plus 2010

Bottom line: Simple interface but poorly implemented; frequent crashes, indiscriminate program blocking

Enter your email address to receive NextAdvisor.com Daily Blog updates:

Categories


Blog Archives


Jessica Biel: The web's most dangerous celeb

August 25th, 2009 - Posted by Kent

Internet security software provider McAfee has identified Jessica Biel as "the most dangerous celebrity to search in cyberspace." Biel takes this dubious honor from last year's winner, Brad Pitt. What makes a celebrity "dangerous to search"?

Every year McAfee ranks the celebrity searches most likely to lead users to sites that contain "spyware, adware, spam, phishing, viruses and other malware." According to McAfee, looking for the goods on your favorite celebs can be hazardous to your computer's health and security. A search for Biel has a one-in-five chance of pulling up a malicious site. Who else made the list? Beyonce, Miley Cyrus, Ashley Tisdale, Lindsay Lohan, Megan Fox, Angelina Jolie, Tom Brady, and Gisele Bundchen. The Obamas, it turns out, are much safer. Of course we can't blame the celebrities; cyber criminals follow popularity just like we do, only for different reasons.

This doesn't mean celeb watchers have to give up their past time, but it does mean they should be smart about their surfing. Users should be particularly careful of downloads. Download wallpapers only from trusted sites (such as the celebrity's own site), and be extremely wary of video. We know from recent virus tests we've conducted in our lab that cyber criminals are capitalizing on video by building trojans into supposed flash plugins, or phishing from sites that clone YouTube.

Finally, make sure you have Internet security software installed and that it's up-to-date. Check out our reviews and comparisons of Internet security software to see how different options stack up.

Leave a Reply

Recent Comments



Disclosure: NextAdvisor.com is a consumer information site that offers free, independent reviews and ratings of online services. We receive advertising revenue from most of the services we review. Our editors thoroughly research and whenever possible test each service we review and offer their honest opinions about each one. We are independently owned and operated and all opinions expressed on this site are our own.