<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox stores your passwords without encryption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nextadvisor.com/blog/2008/09/22/firefox-3-stores-your-passwords-without-encryption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nextadvisor.com/blog/2008/09/22/firefox-3-stores-your-passwords-without-encryption/</link>
	<description>Daily resource for independent consumer information and service reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester Shead</title>
		<link>http://www.nextadvisor.com/blog/2008/09/22/firefox-3-stores-your-passwords-without-encryption/comment-page-1/#comment-62796</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester Shead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextadvisor.com/blog/?p=303#comment-62796</guid>
		<description>I was just looking for this info for a while. After six hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this type of informative sites in top of the list. Usually the top websites are full of garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking for this info for a while. After six hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this type of informative sites in top of the list. Usually the top websites are full of garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

